So... what do you think of this? I personally think it's a silly remark. It only applies to Christians... What do I care about blaspheeming against a religion that I am not a member of? Indeed, a majority of the worlds population is not Christian. Additionally, it is freedom of speech. As long as there is no clear and present danger to persons, or the government, it's fine to say/do. By the way, this was a letter to the paper I read, not an actual article, hence the image distortion on the name.
_{(I could have erased it. I wanted to look profesional)}

sorry about the discontinuity of the below images melded to make one. Adds character.




Some would argue that this form of "militant" corrections is beyond humane.
I can see that with the lady and the thief, but not the genocidal overlords.
What bleeding hearts fail to see is that these people killed thousands of individuals for their skin color and religion. What they see are "People" tied to posts being fired upon. Even the Pope wanted to declar clemency upon them.
But the instant someone kills a bunch of white rich Christians, let's see what side the bleeding hearts are on. It's a matter of perspective judgement. I'll tell you what I think. They weren't human the moment they commited the act. Therefore, they should die like the animals that they were.



More silliness! I know, a child is a very important thing. But when the first one, maybe two guys end up dying, it's a clear sign to stop. If two strapping men couldn't make it out of the hole, what makes you think the kid has still a metabolic process left in him? Come on now.
I know, if I was in a similar situation I would want my kiddo out as fast as possible... But if events bordering that of this stories occurs, then my logic centers would tell me its all a waste of men. It might sound horrible, but people have to come to grips that even those close to them can die if they ever want to evolve into thinking beings.

Email your opinions...





Or sign the book.
Read what is there. | Contribute.